Exploring Marginalization and Social Injustice: A Critical Discourse Analysis of William Blake's “The Chimney Sweeper”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47067/real.v8i1.408Keywords:
William Blake, The Chimney Sweeper, Critical Discourse Analysis, Marginalization, Social Injustice, Child Labor, Religious IdeologyAbstract
This research applies Norman Fairclough's model of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to critically analyze the themes of marginalization and social injustice in William Blake's The Chimney Sweeper. The research qualitatively analyzes both versions of the poem, Songs of Innocence and Songs of Experience by William Blake. This study employs a close reading of both the texts in order to find out the forms that power constructions around issues of child labor, class exploitation, and religious ideologies in 18th-century England take, using CDA in three stages: textual analysis, discursive practice, and social practice. From the textual analysis, metaphors, symbolism, imagery, and irony are used in order to symbolize both literal and figurative entrapment into child labor, disparity, and marginalization. The change from the voice of innocence to the voice of experience reflects the growth in class consciousness and institutionalized criticism of power. The discursive practice stage unpacks how Blake condemns the role church and state play in the role of maintaining social stratification and exploitation of labor, stripping to light the religious discourse that makes the oppressed meek. Social practice analysis highlights how Blake's poetry acts as resistance to the broader social systems that function as models of exploitation and fall in line with institutional practices of exclusion. Thus, Blake's use of language is not simply a reflection of social injustice but rather a critique and call for reform. This shows that the issues that Blake portrays in his writing are indeed the issues that society is concerned about today regarding debates over labor rights and institutional power. It can therefore be argued that language has the capability of questioning social inequality and marginalization.
References
Abdulla-Al-Mamun, M. (2021). A marxist reading of William Blake’s selected poetry: Machineries in Green Studies.
Aers, D., Cook, J., & Punter, D. (2016). Romanticism and ideology: Studies in English writing 1765-1830. Routledge.
Arab, R., & Ellinghausen, L. (2023). Intersectionalities of class in early modern English drama. Springer.
Assadi, J., Sindawi, K., & Na'amneh, M. (2024). The feminist Rrhythm: Exploring Khoury, Qaraman, and Daher’s poetic worlds. Journal of International Crisis & Risk Communication Research (JICRCR), 7.
Bano, M., Altaf, K., & Jahan, J. (2025). Critical discourse analysis of William Blake's poem “London”. Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT), 8(1), 44-56.
Bennett, R. (2022). Undisciplining nineteenth-century literary studies at the University of Guyana and Centering Representations of Indigeneity. Victorian Studies, 64(2), 264-269.
Calvin, K. (2013). Binary Domination and Bondage: Blake's Representations of Race, Nationalism, and Gender Vanderbilt University].
Cogan, L. (2021). Blake and the failure of prophecy. Springer. Damrosch, L. (2015). Eternity's sunrise: the imaginative world of William Blake. Yale University Press.
Darnill, E. J. (2010). " Four-fold vision see": Allegory in the poetry of Edmund Spenser and William Blake. University of Exeter (United Kingdom).
Eisenman, S. F., Crosby, M., Ferrell, E., Leveton, J. H., Mitchell, W. J. T., & Murphy, J. P. (2017). William Blake and the age of aquarius. Princeton University Press.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis. In The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 9-20). Routledge.
Fisher, J. L. (2017). Thackeray’s skeptical narrative and the ‘Perilous Trade’of Authorship. Routledge.
George Jr, A., & Hobson, C. Z. (2013). Blake, politics, and history. Routledge.
Greathouse, P., & Malo-Juvera, V. (2021). Young adult and canonical literature: Pairing and teaching. Rowman & Littlefield.
Horži?, H. (2018). The hild chimney sweep in English children’s literature. University of Zagreb. Faculty of Teacher Education].
Kohlke, M.-L. (2011). Neo-Victorian childhoods: Re-Imagining the worst of times. In Neo-Victorian Families (pp. 119-147). Brill Rodopi.
Leonard, A. M. (1994). Reading political poetry: a discourse analysis of the antislavery poems of John Greenleaf Whittier and the Corn Law Rhymes of Ebenezer Elliott. The George Washington University.
McClard, M. J. (2008). Making a heaven of the innocents’ misery: William Blake’s “Chimney Sweeper” Poems. Academic Forum,
Nebioglu, R. C. (2020). William Blake on slavery: Mind-forg’d manacles in visions of the daughters of Albion and America: A Prophecy. Interactions, 47-62.
Norvig, G. S. (2009). On creativity and psychological boundaries in the life and work of William Blake. Fielding Graduate University.
Powell, K. I. (2023). Ecology and retribution: Blake, Tokarczuk, and Animal Rights Brigham Young University].
Rodgers, L. (2024). Labour law and the person: An Agenda for Social Justice. Policy Press.
Tedeschi, S. (2017). Urbanization and English romantic poetry (Vol. 117). Cambridge University Press.
Todres, J., & Higinbotham, S. (2015). Human rights in children's literature: Imagination and the narrative of law. Oxford University Press.
Udowiczenko, R. O. (2018). The Symmetrical Tyger: the issues and tensions of teaching Romantic poetry at A-level. Canterbury Christ Church University (United Kingdom).
Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4, 249-263.
Zengin, M. (2014). William Blake’s “London”: A resistance to power and authority. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Co?rafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 54(1), 117-148.
