How do Pakistan’s current honour Killing Laws reflect both Colonial Legal Legacies and Islamic Legal Principles, and what does this reveal about the Possibilities for Epistemic Disobedience in Legal Reform?

Authors

  • Arfa Shahzad Tiwana Lacas School System, Johar Town Campus, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47067/real.v8i3.445

Keywords:

Killing Laws, Islamic Legal Principles, Epistemic Disobedience, Legal Reform

Abstract

The discussions that follow will identify the extent to which the laws pertaining to honour killings in Pakistan reflect a colonial legacy intertwined with Islamic law, as well as suggesting ways for radical reform. Although honour killings are legally treated as murder, the act is murder in the guise of ‘restoring the family honour’. Despite the enactments of 2004 and 2016, loopholes pertaining to forgiveness, compromise, and judicial discretion continue to persist, and hence, the perpetrators continue to escape punishment. This will draw on qualitative methods to analyse the legal texts and critiques of feminists and authors like Walter Mignolo, Mahmood Mamdani, and Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui in the context of decolonial theory. My findings suggest that colonial laws such as Qisas and Diya, along with the law of provocation, continue to thrive, and the Islamic law of fasad fil arz is invoked selectively and in a patriarchal manner. The judges of informal justice structures like jirgas exacerbate honour killings by legitimising them. As such, real reform will necessitate more than a mere increase in law enforcement or penalties. Your recommendations serve the purpose of what Mignolo terms as epistemic disobedience the reconsideration of the conceptualisation of law, religion and justice. Paradigm shifts as proposed by the decolonial school justifies epistemic disobedience as one of the ways to engage critically with our understanding of law, religion, and society. I would use honour killings to show that the law cannot be reformed through technicist approaches but, rather, requires a reconsideration of the epistemic fundamentals of justice. It remains a useful strategy because it shifts the discourse on punishment to the consideration of legal systems that genuinely uphold dignity and the sanctity of life.

References

Al Jazeera Podcasts. “Why a So-Called Honor Killing in Pakistan Has Sparked National Outrage.” July 30, 2025. Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/podcasts/2025/7/30/why-a-so-called-honor-killing-in-pakistan-has-sparked national-outrage

Aurat Foundation. “Honour Killings in Pakistan: Report.” 2013. Available at: https://www.af.org.pk/pub_files/1366345831.pdf

Khan, A. “The Federally Administered Tribal Areas of Pakistan and the Legacy of Colonial Violence.” Asian Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 25, 2015.

LUMS Shaikh Ahmad Hassan School of Law. “‘Honour’ Killings in Pakistan: Judicial and Legal Treatment of the Crime – A Feminist Perspective.” 2024.

Mahmood Mamdani. Define and Rule: Native as Political Identity. Harvard University Press, 2012. Mignolo, Walter D. “Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and De-Colonial Freedom.”

Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 26, no. 7–8, 2009, pp. 159–181.

Pakistan Penal Code (PPC). Sections 302, 309, 311. Government of Pakistan.

Rivera Cusicanqui, Silvia. “Ch’ixinakax utxiwa: A Reflection on the Practices and Discourses of Decolonization.” South Atlantic Quarterly, vol. 111, no. 1, 2012, pp. 95–109.

Shahnaz, F. “Honour Killings and Pakistan’s Women Protection Bill: A Background for Understanding Colonialism and Patriarchy.” National Law School of India Review, vol. 72, 2010.

Sindh High Court. Mst. Shahida Parveen v. The State. PLD 2005 Sindh 77 (declaring jirgas unconstitutional in Sindh).

South Asian Studies Journal (Punjab University). “Causes and Consequences of Child Marriage: Pakistan’s

Perspective.” Vol. 9, 2019, pp. 45–60. Available at: https://sasj.pu.edu.pk/9/article/view/680/681

Supreme Court of Pakistan. Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2004 and Criminal Law (Amendment) (Offences in the Name or on the Pretext of Honour) Act 2016. Islamabad: Government of Pakistan, Gazette.

Supreme Court of Pakistan. “Judgment on Jirgas and Panchayats Declared Unconstitutional.” Suo Motu Case, 2012.

The Nation. “SC Declares FATA Interim Regulation Unconstitutional.” Jan. 17, 2019. Available at: https://www.nation.com.pk/17-Jan-2019/sc-declares-fata-interim-regulation-unconstitutional

Voicepk.net. “‘Dishonourable Men’: Killing Women for Honour.” 2022. Available at: https://voicepk.net/2022/12/16-days-of-activism-the-dishonourable-men-killing-women-for-honour/

Voicepk.net. “Exhumation Reveals Brutal Honour Killing by Woman’s Own Family.” 2025. Available at: https://voicepk.net/2025/04/exhumation-reveals-brutal-honour-killing-by-womans-own-family/

Wasti, Tahir H. The Application of Islamic Criminal Law in Pakistan: Sharia in Practice. Brill, 2009.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-24

How to Cite

Tiwana, A. S. (2025). How do Pakistan’s current honour Killing Laws reflect both Colonial Legal Legacies and Islamic Legal Principles, and what does this reveal about the Possibilities for Epistemic Disobedience in Legal Reform? . Review of Education, Administration & Law, 8(3), 447-460. https://doi.org/10.47067/real.v8i3.445