Focus on the Responsibility of States under International Law for Environmental Damages that Cross Borders
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47067/real.v8i2.420Keywords:
State Responsibility, International Law, Transboundary Environmental Harm, Global Commons, Environmental Justice, Nor Harm Rule, Sovereignty, International CooperationAbstract
This in-depth study examines the various aspects of the obligations of the states in the wide picture of international law of environmental harm spanning borders. It discusses the new and crucial issue of transboundary environmental harm in our highly interdependent and globalized world. Since various activities of industries and extensive environmental degradation cross state boundaries, international regimes of law have emerged and evolved to manage the behavior of states effectively. The regimes are required so that environmental degradation does not generate detrimental effects on neighboring or distant states. This study analyzes in depth some of the fundamentals of law, starting with the fundamental "no harm" rule, due diligence requirements to which states are subject, and the overall regime of state responsibility. This study also looks at pertinent international instruments such as the Stockholm Declaration, the Rio Declaration, and the Paris Agreement, all of which have an important contribution in addressing these queries. Analyzing classic legal precedents such as the Trail Smelter Arbitration, this study investigates various theoretical paradigms of key concepts such as sovereignty, the global commons, and the quest for ecological justice. Through the course of such investigation, the study brings out the complex nuances which are intrinsic to the application of state responsibility in the context of the world. Also, it outlines both the tremendous strides as well as the current boundaries of current regimes in the course of discussing key challenges. These range from political resistance faced from various actors, jurisdictional issues in the enforcement process, and the overall challenges that come with the effective enforcement of measures of law. The findings of this research indicate the imperative for intensified international collaboration, the establishment of more efficient legal instruments, and the utilization of more intensive mechanisms of accountability in a bid to address transboundary environmental concerns effectively. Finally, this research has important observations in terms of the continuous evolution of international environmental law and its implications for the future in the context of sustainable development and protection of transboundary environment.
References
Aguilera, R. V., & Grøgaard, B. (2019). The dubious role of institutions in international business: A road forward. Journal of International Business Studies, 50, 20-35.
Blank, Y. (2017). The city and the world. In International legal personality (pp. 105-170). Routledge.
Bodansky, D., & Van Asselt, H. (2024). The art and craft of international environmental law. Oxford University Press.
Dallimer, M., & Strange, N. (2015). Why socio-political borders and boundaries matter in conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30(3), 132-139.
Falk, R. A. (2017). On the quasi-legislative competence of the General Assembly. In International Organizations (pp. 297-306). Routledge.
Gibney, M. J. (2015). Refugees and justice between states. European Journal of Political Theory, 14(4), 448-463.
Koh, H. H. (2017). Transnational legal process. In The Nature of International Law (pp. 311-338). Routledge.
Kok, C. L., Ho, C. K., Koh, Y. Y., Heng, J. B. W., & Teo, T. H. (2024). Psychological Aspects of AI Enhanced Learning Experiences. TENCON 2024-2024 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON),
Koskenniemi, M. (2017). The politics of international law. In The nature of international law (pp. 355-384). Routledge.
Kosmützky, A., & Putty, R. (2016). Transcending borders and traversing boundaries: A systematic review of the literature on transnational, offshore, cross-border, and borderless higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 20(1), 8-33.
Lauterpacht, H. (2017). The Grotian tradition in international law. In Grotius and Law (pp. 469-521). Routledge.
Lee, R. (2019). Extreme speech in Myanmar: The role of state media in the Rohingya forced migration crisis. International Journal of Communication.
Passas, N. (2017). Globalization, criminogenic asymmetries and economic crime. In International crimes (pp. 17-42). Routledge.
Ramasastry, A. (2015). Corporate social responsibility versus business and human rights: Bridging the gap between responsibility and accountability. Journal of Human Rights, 14(2), 237-259.
Slaughter, A.-M. (2017). The accountability of government networks. In The Globalization of International Law (pp. 471-496). Routledge.