Beyond Memorization: Cultivating Critical Thinking Skills through Classic Literature in Secondary Education for the 21st Century Learner

Authors

  • Batool Hassan 1MPhil. English Literature, Minhaj University Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Rafiq-uz-Zaman Ph.D. Education, Department of Education, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Zahid Ali Khan Group Editor, Ittifaq-e-Rai Group of Publications, Bahawalpur, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47067/real.v8i1.410

Keywords:

Classic Literature, Critical Thinking, Secondary Education, Cognitive Development, Inquiry-Based Learning, Pedagogical Strategies

Abstract

The use of classic literature to develop critical thinking skills is commendable for secondary school. This paper analyzes classic texts, using modern pedagogical methods to demonstrate that they can improve students' abilities to analyze, interpret, evaluate, and synthesize information. Traditional pedagogy does not allow students to develop their critical thinking but to remember more things. Socratic Seminars, inquiry-based learning, and group discussions provide new methods to let students deal with complex narratives, moral conflicts, and symbolic meanings and enable them to develop analytical reasoning and intellectual autonomy. This paper discusses the cognitive benefits of classic literature reading through various studies. Reading plays like Hamlet, and The Great Gatsby facilitates students' inferential and evaluative capacity, and these results confirm it. Deeper meanings and moral conflicts in ambiguous language encourage students to develop advanced viewpoints by encouraging deeper meanings. In addition, digital technologies and multimedia tools augment the accessibility and engagement of classic literature in relation to modern learners. Although these benefits still exist, challenges like historical biases of the literary canon and a heterogeneous student population remain. The challenges that need to be addressed can be tackled through solutions such as incorporating culturally diverse texts, exploring themes related to real-life issues, and implementing differentiated instruction. Additionally, further research is required to investigate the long-term effects of classic literature on cognitive development and to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative instructional methods. Instead, classical literature can be utilized by educators who adopt innovative teaching methods to equip students for academic challenges and real-world issues.

References

Alexander, J., Savigny, H., Thorsen, E., & Jackson, D. (2015). Introduction: Marginalised Voices, Representations and Practices. In Media, Margins and Popular Culture (pp. 1-12). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Applebee, A. N. (1993). Literature in the secondary school: Studies of curriculum and instruction in the United States. National Council of Teachers of English, 1111 W. Kenyon Rd., Urbana, IL 61801-1096 (Stock No. 30070-3050: $14.95 members, $19.95 nonmembers)..

Aston, R. (2020). The role of the literary canon in the teaching of literature. Routledge.

Bak?r, G. Y. (2015). Using critical lenses to teach to “kill a mockingbird”: an interpretive synthesis (Master's thesis, Bilkent Universitesi (Turkey)).

Baldick, C. (2015). The Oxford dictionary of literary terms. Oxford university press.

Bloom, H. (2014). The western canon: The books and school of the ages. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Brewer, K. L. (2018). Literary Criticism in the 21st Century: Theory Renaissance by Vincent B. Leitch. South Central Review, 35(2), 140-142.

Cammarata, L. (2016). Foreign language education and the development of inquiry-driven language programs: Key challenges and curricular planning strategies. In Content-based foreign language teaching (pp. 123-146). Routledge.

Damrosch, D. (2003). What is world literature? Princeton University Press.

De Vos, J., & De Vos, J. (2016). The educated brain: a critique of neuroeducation. The Metamorphoses of the Brain–Neurologisation and its Discontents, 13-51.

Dorier, J. L., & García, F. J. (2013). Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of inquiry-based learning in day-to-day teaching. ZDM, 45, 837-849.

Eaglestone, R. (2017). Doing English: A guide for literature students. Routledge.

Elder, L., & Paul, R. (2020). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life. Foundation for Critical Thinking.

Eliot, T. S. (2010). Notes towards the Definition of Culture. Faber & Faber.

Enciso, O. L. U., Enciso, D. S. U., & Daza, M. D. P. V. (2017). Critical thinking and its importance in education: Some reflections. Rastros Rostros, 19(34), 78-88.

Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision. Topoi, 37, 165-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4

Facione, P. (1990). Critical Thinking: a statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction (The Delphi Report). https://philarchive.org/rec/FACCTA

Facione, P. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction (The Delphi Report). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED315423

Groccia, J. E. (2018). What is student engagement? New directions for teaching and learning, 2018(154), 11-20.

Grubert, E., & Siders, A. (2016). Benefits and applications of interdisciplinary digital tools for environmental meta-reviews and analyses. Environmental Research Letters, 11(9), 093001.

Guillory, J. (2023). Cultural capital: The problem of literary canon formation. University of Chicago Press.

Haji Maibodi, A. (2014). The effect of critical thinking skills on reading English novels. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 2(2), 97-108.

Halpern, D. F. (2013). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. Psychology press.

Isariyawat, C., Yenphech, C., & Intanoo, K. (2020). The role of literature and literary texts in an EFL context: Cultural awareness and language skills. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(3), 1320-1333.

Johnson, T. (2018). Psychological Complexity in Hamlet: An Analytical Study. Shakespearean Review, 51(1), 45-62.

Khatib, M., & Alizadeh, I. (2012). Critical thinking skills through literary and non-literary texts in English classes. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(4), 563.

Kivunja, C. (2015). Teaching students to learn and to work well with 21st century skills: Unpacking the career and life skills domain of the new learning paradigm. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v4n1p1

Langer, J. A. (2011). Envisioning knowledge: Building literacy in the academic disciplines. Teachers College Press.

Lauter, P. (1991). Canons and contexts. Oxford University Press.

Loes, C. N., & Pascarella, E. T. (2017). Collaborative learning and critical thinking: Testing the link. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(5), 726-753.

Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Critical thinking and constructivism techniques for improving student achievement. In National Forum of Teacher Education Journal (Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 1-9).

Massey, D. D. (2015). Reading history: Moving from memorizing facts to critical thinking. Improving reading comprehension of middle and high school students, 19-47.

McMillan, J. H. (1987). Enhancing college students' critical thinking: A review of studies. Research in higher education, 26, 3-29.

Miller, B. W., Anderson, R. C., Morris, J., Lin, T. J., Jadallah, M., & Sun, J. (2014). The effects of reading to prepare for argumentative discussion on cognitive engagement and conceptual growth. Learning and Instruction, 33, 67-80.

Nussbaum, M. C. (2016). Not for profit: why democracy needs the humanities-Updated edition.

Pishghadam, R. (2008). Enhancing critical thinking with literary discussion. New Literary Studies, 40(2), 153-167.

Ranjana, L. (2022). Usage of Constructivist Approach for Critical Thinking. RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 7(9), 69-73.

Rose, J. C., Lincoln, A. J., & Allen, M. H. (1992). Ability profiles of developmental language disordered and learning disabled children: A comparative analysis. Developmental Neuropsychology, 8(4), 413-426.

Sadler, S. (2024). A canon of collaboration: literary value, student voices and diversity in contemporary studies of literature (Doctoral dissertation).

Saye, J. W., & Brush, T. (1999). Student engagement with social issues in a multimedia-supported learning environment. Theory & Research in Social Education, 27(4), 472-504.

Shao, J. (2020). Symbols Used in the Great Gatsby. Learning & Education, 9(5), 159-161.

Showalter, E. (2010). A jury of her peers: Celebrating American women writers from Anne Bradstreet to Annie Proulx. Vintage.

Smale-Jacobse, A. E., Meijer, A., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Maulana, R. (2019). Differentiated instruction in secondary education: A systematic review of research evidence. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 2366.

Surma, T., Vanhees, C., Wils, M., Nijlunsing, J., Crato, N., Hattie, J., ... & Kirschner, P. A. (2025). Developing Curriculum for Deep Thinking: The Knowledge Revival.

Thompson, W. (2022). Socratic Dialogue in Literature Classes. Journal of Educational Methods, 50(1), 15-32.

Uspayanti, R., Manuhutu, N., Butarbutar, R., Bawawa, M., & Habeahan, N. (2019, November). Enhancing Literal and Interpretive Reading Comprehension through Collaborative Strategic Reading. In International Conference on Social Science 2019 (ICSS 2019) (pp. 206-212). Atlantis Press.

Willingham, D. T. (2007). Critical thinking: Why it is so hard to teach?. American federation of teachers summer 2007, p. 8-19.

Wu, Y. (2018). Research on the Teaching Model of Reading Literary Classics from the Cross-cultural Perspective. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(9), 1215-1220.

Zajda, J., & Zajda, J. (2021). Constructivist learning theory and creating effective learning environments. Globalisation and education reforms: Creating effective learning environments, 35-50.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-22

How to Cite

Hassan, B., Rafiq-uz-Zaman, M. ., & Khan, Z. A. . (2025). Beyond Memorization: Cultivating Critical Thinking Skills through Classic Literature in Secondary Education for the 21st Century Learner. Review of Education, Administration & Law, 8(1), 115-124. https://doi.org/10.47067/real.v8i1.410