Association of Demographic Predictors with Multidimensional Aspects of Students’ Engagement and Their Academic Performance In High Schools of Southern Punjab, Pakistan


  • Tehmina Sattar
  • Muhammad Imdad Ullah
  • Asad Ur Rehman
  • Hina Ismail



Demographic, Predictors, Multidimensional, Engagement, Paradox, Academic Performance


The present study addressed the major demographic predictors affecting the integrated paradox of students’ engagement and their academic performance in high schools of Southern Punjab, Pakistan. By using multistage sampling technique, N=2758 high school students were sampled out through cross sectional survey research design. The findings of the study revealed that students of highly educated parents i.e. up to tertiary level, residing in family size of 5-10 members and having middle class socio-economic status were more engaged in studies and performed better in exams. In conclusion, gender, parental education, socio-economic status, family size, family type and geographical residence were the major demographic factors affecting students’ academic outcomes. Usage of social constructionism strategies, analytical thinking and multifarious instruction techniques can be helpful in increasing the students’ academic outcomes.


Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386.

Betts, J. E., Appleton, J. J., Reschly, A. L., Christenson, S. L., & Huebner, E. S. (2010). A study of the factorial invariance of the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI): Results from middle and high school students. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 84.

Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., Appleton, J. J., Berman, S., Spanjers, D., & Varro, P. (2008). Best practices in fostering student engagement. In Best practices in school psychology V. National Association of School Psychologists.

Dalton, B., Glennie, E., & Ingels, S. J. (2009). Late High School Dropouts: Characteristics, Experiences, and Changes Across Cohorts. Descriptive Analysis Report. NCES 2009-307. National Center for Education Statistics.

Davis, M. H., & McPartland, J. M. (2012). High school reform and student engagement. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 515-539). Springer, Boston, MA.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.

Du-Paul, G. J., Rapport, M. D., & Perriello, L. M. (1991). Teacher ratings of academic skills: The development of the Academic Performance Rating Scale. School Psychology Review, 20(2), 284-300.

Dustmann, C., & Van Soest, A. (2008). Part-time work, school success and school leaving. In The economics of education and training (pp. 23-45). Physica-Verlag HD.

Entwisle, D. R., Alexander, K. L., & Olson, L. S. (2005). Urban teenagers: Work and dropout. Youth & Society, 37(1), 3-32.

Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117-142.

Finn, J. D., & Voelkl, K. E. (1993). School characteristics related to student engagement. The Journal of Negro Education, 62(3), 249-268.

Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter?. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97-131). Springer, Boston, MA.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.

Furlong, M. J., & Christenson, S. L. (2008). Engaging students at school and with learning: A relevant construct for all students. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 365-368.

Green, J., Liem, G. A. D., Martin, A. J., Colmar, S., Marsh, H. W., & Mclnerney, D. (2012). Academic motivation, self-concept, engagement, and performance in high school: Key processes from a longitudinal perspective. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1111-1122.

Green, J., Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2007). Motivation and engagement in English, mathematics and science high school subjects: Towards an understanding of multidimensional domain specificity. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(3), 269-279.

Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., & Kim, A. (2009). Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically oriented Korean students?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 644.

Kalmijn, M., & Kraaykamp, G. (2003). Dropout and downward mobility in the educational career: An event-history Anaylsis of ethnic schooling differences in the Netherlands. Educational Research and Evaluation, 9(3), 265-287.

Lawson, M. A., & Masyn, K. E. (2015). Analyzing profiles, predictors, and consequences of student engagement dispositions. Journal of School Psychology, 53(1), 63-86.

Miserandino, M. (1996). Children who do well in school: Individual differences in perceived competence and autonomy in above-average children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 203.

Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259-282). Springer, Boston, MA.

Plank, S., DeLuca, S., & Estacion A. (2005). Dropping out of high school and the place of career and technical education: A survival analysis of surviving high school. National Research Center for Career and Technical Education, S.P.M.N. & National Dissemination Center for Career and Technical Education, C.O.H.

Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149-172). Springer, Boston, MA.

Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257-267.

Reeve, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Self-determination theory: A dialectical framework for understanding socio-cultural influences on student motivation. Big theories revisited, 4, 31-60.

Reeve, J., Lee, W., Kim, H., & Ahn, H. S. (2011). Longitudinal test of the hypothesis that student engagement fully mediates the motivation-to-achievement relation. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Rumberger, R. W. (1983). Dropping out of high school: The influence of race, sex, and family background. American Educational Research Journal, 20(2), 199-220.

Rumberger, R. W., & Rotermund, S. (2012). The relationship between engagement and high school dropout. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 491-513). Springer, Boston, MA.

Sattar, T., Ullah, M. I., Ahmad, S., & Warraich, I. A. (2019). An Integrated Web Model Study of Behavioral, Emotional and Cognitive Engagement Factors Affecting the Academic Performance of High School Students through their Multidimensional Engagement in Learning Milieu: A Study of South Punjab, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS), 39(4).

Sattar, T., Zakar, R., Zakar, M. Z., & Ullah, M. I. (2019). Socio-educational Predictors Affecting the Academic Performance of High School Students Through their Multidimensional Engagement in Learning Milieu: A Convoluted Intricate Web Model Study in Southern Punjab, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS), 39(2).

Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (2009a). Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. Handbook of motivation at school, 223-245.

Suryadarma, D., Suryahadi, A., & Sumarto, S. (2006). Causes of low secondary school enrollment in Indonesia. Jakarta: SMERU Research Institute.

Teese, R., & Walstab, A. (2002). Early leaving in Victoria: Geographical patterns, origins, and strategic issues. Educational Outcomes Research Unit, University of Melbourne.

Wellborn, J. G. (1993). Engaged and disaffected action: The conceptualization and measurement of motivation in the academic domain.

Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing Achievement Goal Theory: Using Goal Structures and Goal Orientations to Predict Students' Motivation, Cognition, and Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 236.

Yonezawa, S., Jones, M., & Joselowsky, F. (2009). Youth engagement in high schools: Developing a multidimensional, critical approach to improving engagement for all students. Journal of Educational Change, 10(2-3), 191-209.




How to Cite

Sattar, T. ., Ullah , M. I. ., Rehman , A. U. ., & Ismail , H. . (2020). Association of Demographic Predictors with Multidimensional Aspects of Students’ Engagement and Their Academic Performance In High Schools of Southern Punjab, Pakistan. Review of Education, Administration & Law, 3(1), 53-61.