Impact of Leader’s State of Core Self-Evaluation on Task Complexity: A Quantitative Analysis

Authors

  • Muhammad Zia-ur- Rehman Post-Doc Fellow at Universiti Malaya & Faculty Member, National Defence University, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Ribbat Khan PhD Scholar, National Defence University, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Shafique PhD Scholar, National Defence University, Islamabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47067/real.v6i1.309

Keywords:

Cognition Abilities , Leader Core Self-Evaluation, Task Complexity, Quantitative Study, Efficiency

Abstract

This study aims to explore the association between a leader's State of Core Self-Evaluation and the complexity of tasks assigned to them. Previous research on this topic has established a strong foundation for the conceptual framework and hypotheses used in this study. A quantitative approach was employed, utilizing an adapted questionnaire to gather data from 141 organizational leaders holding various positions in the banking sector. Statistical analysis of the data demonstrates that a leader's core self-evaluation is positively linked to task complexity. This implies that when leaders believe they possess the necessary abilities and skills to handle a task, their cognitive skills improve, leading to efficient task completion. Conversely, when leaders perceive a task as complex, they may exhibit avoidance behaviour and refrain from attempting to complete the task. These findings are useful in assessing leaders' performance under different levels of task complexity, particularly in a demanding work environment. Policymakers can also benefit from this research in understanding what triggers leader behaviour when task complexity increases. The results of this study align with previous research, indicating that a leader's State of Core Self-Evaluation and task complexity are crucial considerations in the field of management.

References

Andersen, S. M., & Chen, S. (2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109, 619–645.

Arnold, K. A., Turner, N., Barling, J., Kelloway, K., & McKee, M. C. (2007). Transformational leadership and psychological well-being: The mediating role of meaningful

Arnsten, A. F. (2009). Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 10, 410–422.

Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (1991). The full range leadership development programs: Basic and advanced manuals. Binghamton, NY: Bass, Avolio & Associates.

Avolio, B. J., Zhu, W., Koh, W., & Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and

Balthazard, P. A.,Waldman, D. A., Thatcher, R. W., & Hannah, S. T. (2012). Differentiating transformational and non-transformational leaders on the basis of neurological imaging. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 244–258.

Bonner, B. L. (1994). Expertise, task conditions, and strategy use: An exploratory investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57(2), 290-313. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1021

Butler, A. C., Chapman, J. E., Forman, E. M., & Beck, A. T. (2006). The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 17–31.

Demands–Resources model. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19, 735–759.

Earley, P. C. (1985). Influence of the task dimensionality on the dynamic effects of goal-setting on task performance. Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 228-240. https://doi.org/10.5465/255991

extension of the resource-based theory perspective. Social Behavior and Personality, 37, 1259–1278.

Hackman, J.R., 1969. Toward understanding the role of tasks in behavioral research. Acta Psychologica 31, 97e128.

Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 206–219.

Judge, T. A., Erez, A., & Bono, J. E. (1998). The power of being positive: The relation between positive self-concept and job performance. Human Performance, 11, 167–187.

Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., & Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151–188.

Judge, T. A., Van Vianen, A. E. M., & De Pater, I. E. (2004). Emotional stability, core self-evaluations, and job outcomes: A review of the evidence and an agenda for future research. Human Performance, 17, 325–346.

Marshall, S. P., & Bryd, T. J. (1998). Exploring the relationship between task complexity and individual performance. Journal of Management, 24(1), 101-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639802400107 moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 951–968.

Paquette, L., & Kida, T. (1988). Decision strategies and organization design. Organizational Dynamics, 17(1), 46–57.

Proudfoot, J. G., Corr, P. J., Guest, D. E., & Dunn, G. (2009). Cognitive-behavioural training to change attributional style improves employee well-being, job satisfaction, productivity, and turnover. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 147–153.

Ruwaard, J., Lange, A., Bouwman, M., Broeksteeg, J., & Schrieken, B. (2007). E-mailed standardized cognitive behavioural treatment of work-related stress: A randomized controlled trial. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 36, 179–192.

Saastamoinen, M., Kumpulainen, S., Vakkari, P. & Järvelin, K. (2013). Task complexity affects information use: a questionnaire study in city administration.Information Research, 18(4) paper 592. [Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/18-4/paper592.html]

Sosik, J. J., & Godshalk, V. M. (2000). Leadership styles, mentoring functions received, and job-related stress: A conceptual model and preliminary study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 365–390.

Swink, M., & Speier, C. (1999). The influence of task and technology on group performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(4), 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1999.11518245

Tsai, W. C., Chen, H. W., & Cheng, J. W. (2009). Employee positive moods as a mediator linking transformational leadership and employee work outcomes. The

Turner, N., Barling, J., & Zaharatos, A. (2002). Positive psychology atwork. In C. R. Snyder, & S. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 715–728). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Van den Broeck, A., De Cuyper, N., DeWitte, H., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). Not all job demands are equal: Differentiating job hindrances and job challenges in the Job

Van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., De Cremer, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2004). Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly,15, 825–856.

Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (1988). The new leadership: Managing participation in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice.

Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and decision making. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Waldman, D. A., Javidan,M., & Varella, P. (2004). Charismatic leadership at the strategic level: A new application of upper echelons theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 355–380.

Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., & Zhu, W. (2008). How transformational leadership weaves its influence on individual job performance: The role of identification and efficacy beliefs. Personnel Psychology, 61, 793–825.

Wang, X. -H. F., & Howell, J. M. (2010). Exploring the dual-level effects of transformational leadership on followers. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1134–1144.

Wille, B., & De Fruyt, F. (2014). Vocations as a source of identity: Reciprocal relations between Big Five personality traits and RIASEC characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 262–281.

Wille, B., Hofmans, J., Feys, M., & De Fruyt, F. (2014). Maturation of work attitudes: Correlated change with Big Five personality traits and reciprocal effects over 15 years. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 507–529. work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 193–203.

Yang, Y. F. (2009). An investigation of group interaction functioning stimulated by transformational leadership on employee intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction: An

Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of Management, 15, 251–289.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-22

How to Cite

Rehman , M. Z.- ur-., Khan, R., & Shafique, M. (2023). Impact of Leader’s State of Core Self-Evaluation on Task Complexity: A Quantitative Analysis. Review of Education, Administration & Law, 6(1), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.47067/real.v6i1.309