Arbitrability of Criminal Matters: Putting Things in Perspective

Authors

  • Ikram Ullah Assistant Professor at Law Department, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Aisha Tariq Lecturer at Professor at Law Department, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Mumtaz Ali Khan Director Administration, Punjab High Commission, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47067/real.v5i2.204

Keywords:

Arbitrability, Criminal Matters, Perspective

Abstract

Arbitrability is one of the most contentious and widely discussed issues of arbitration. The aim of taking up this topic in this paper is to establish that the exclusion of a subject matter from the domain of arbitrator’s consideration does not mean the exclusion of each and every aspect of that subject matter. Rather some aspects of a non-arbitrable subject matter may be allowed for arbitrator’s judgment. To prove this point, the arbitrability of criminal matters is discussed to manifest that some issues springing from criminal matters may also be submitted to arbitration.

References

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898

French Code of Civil Procedure

Beattie v. M. & P. Beattie Ltd, (1938) 3 All E R, 214

Bibi Najma and others v. Abdul Rehman, 1998 SCMR 1304

G. M. Pfaff A. G. V. Sartaj Engineeezing Co. Ltd., Lahore and others, PLD 1970 Lahore 184

G. M. Pfaff A. G. v. Sartaj Engineering Co. Ltd. and others, PLD 1971 Supreme Court 564

Haji Muhammad Suleman and another v. Kadir Bux and another, PLD 1965 (W. P.) Karachi 326

Haji Soomar Haji Hajjan v. Muhammad AMin Muhammad Bashir, Ltd 1981 SCMR 129

Hickman v. Kent or Romer Marsh Sheep-Breaders Association, (1915) 1 Ch. 881

Lahore Stock Exchange Limited v. Fredrick J. Whyte Group (Pakistan) Ltd., PLD 1990 Supreme Court 48

London Sack & Bag Co. Ltd. v. Dixon & Lugton Ltd, (1943) 2 All ER 763.

Maulana Abdul Haque Baloch v. Government of Balochistan, PLD 2013 SC 641.

Muhammad Azam Muhammad Fazil & CO Karachi v. N. A. Industrie, Karachi, PLD 1977 Karachi 21

Nadir Khan v. Zeenat Bibi and others, 1990 CLC 293

Pakistan Water and Power Development Authroity v. Kot Addu Power Co. Limited and others. 2002 MLD 829.

Pir Omar Khayyam v. Ruby Hameedullah and others, 2014 YLR 1654

Port Qasim Authority, Karachi v. Al-Ghurair Group of Companies, PLD 1997 Karachi 636

Razia Begum v. Khan Bahadur Allah Bakhsh Gabole PLD 1961 (W. P.) Karachi 225

Sezai Turkes Feyzi Akkaya Construction Company, Lahore v. Crescent Services, Lahore, 1997 SCMR 1928.

Shamim Akhtar v. Najma Baqai and others, PLD 1977 Supreme Court 644

Sir E. Haroon Jaffar & Sons Ltd. v. Haji E. Dossa & Sons, PLD 1956 Karachi 4

The Hub Power Company Limited (HUBCO) v. WAPDA, PLD 2000 Supreme Court 841

Water and Development Authority v. Abdur Razzaq Muhammad Iqbal, PLD 1977 Lahore 5

EMMANUEL GAILLARD AND JHON SAVAGE, FOUCHARD, GAILLARD, GOLDMAN ON INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION, P 573 (Kluwer Law International, Netherlands, 1999).

JULIAN D.M. LEW, QC AND OLIVER MARSDEN, ARBITRABILITY, ED., JULIAN D.M. LEW, QC AND OTHERS, ARBITRATION IN ENGLAND, 19-33 (Kluwer Law International, The Netherlands, 2013).

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Ullah, I. ., Tariq, A. ., & Khan, M. M. A. . (2022). Arbitrability of Criminal Matters: Putting Things in Perspective. Review of Education, Administration & Law, 5(2), 217-229. https://doi.org/10.47067/real.v5i2.204