Teachers Perception Regarding Case Study Method as a Pedagogy in Business Schools

Authors

  • Muhammad Abrar Associate Professor, Lyallpur Business School, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Nauman Abbasi Professor, Institute of Management Sciences, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan
  • Shahnawaz Saqib Visiting Lecturer, Department of Management Sciences, Khawaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47067/real.v4i2.152

Keywords:

Business Education, Case Study Methods, Business Pedagogy

Abstract

Degree awarding institutes aims to cater needs of industry by providing skilled and trained manpower. For this sake, universities tend to design their curriculum. A case study method provides a tool to strengthen the learning of students while maintaining their natural environment. This study instigated perceptions of university teachers regarding case study methods being used and skills generated through the usage of this method at universities. Primary data was collected regarding various skills which are induced by using the case study methods among students for the improvement of business education. Four provinces of the country viz. Punjab, Sindh, KPK, and Baluchistan were approached for data collection from faculty members of both public and private sector universities (Business Schools). A representative sample of 16 universities offering business education (8 public and 8 private sector) was selected. In this connection, 8 universities from Punjab province including 4 in the public and 4 in the private sector whereas 4 universities from Sindh (2 public sector universities and 2 private sector universities), 2 universities from KPK and Baluchistan each (1 public sector university and 1 private sector university) were approached. Fifteen respondents/teachers from each institute were approached for data collection, thus forming a sample size of 240. Initially, teachers were consulted through focus group discussions to dig out the reason for using case study methods in business education. Based on their perception and relevant literature a set of forty questions was devised to identify the basic reasons/benefits of using case study methods by teachers in business education. After applying Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) a set of seven basic attributes was identified. Based on these characteristics revised questionnaires were floated among the survey participants at a large scale. From the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), seven basic factors/reasons have been identified. In Pakistan universities, teachers consider these skills while imparting their teaching expertise to students of business education. According to the perspective of university teachers' most important skill is problem-solving skills generated through the case study method. A similar pattern has been observed for public and private sector university teachers which implies that there is consensus among the teachers at all levels that the case study method generates problem-solving skills among students more importantly.

References

Alon, I., & Welsh, D. H. (2003). International franchising in industrialized markets: Western and Northern Europe: CCH Incorporated.

Bashir, S., Herath, J., & Gebremedhin, T. (2013). Higher education and economic growth: A study for West Virginia.

Bratianu, C., Stanescu, D. F., & Mocanu, R. (2021). Exploring the Knowledge Management Impact on Business Education. Sustainability, 13(4), 2313.

Chaudhary, A. R., Iqbal, A., & Mahmood Gillani, S. Y. (2009). The Nexus between Higher Education and Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation for Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Commerce & Social Sciences, 3.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management Review, 14(4), 532-550.

Garcia-Perez, A.; Cegarra-Navarro, J.G.; Bedford, D.; Thomas, M.; Wakabayashi, S.(2020) Critical Capabilities and Competencies for Knowledge Organizations; Emerald Publishing: Bingley, UK,

Garten, J. E. (1997). Business and foreign policy. Foreign Affairs, 67-79.

Geiger, R. L. (2004). Knowledge and money: Research universities and the paradox of the marketplace: Stanford University Press.

Geiger, R. L., & Sá, C. (2005). Beyond technology transfer: US state policies to harness university research for economic development. Minerva, 43(1), 1-21.

Grant, R. (1997). A claim for the case method in the teaching of geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 21(2), 171-185.

Hamel, J., Dufour, S., & Fortin, D. (1993). Case study methods (Vol. 32): Sage.

Kaleem, A. (2005). Effectiveness of IT in business education: A case of business schools in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 3(8), 1082-1090.

Kolachi, N. A., & Wajidi, A. Z. (2008). Business Education in Pakistan: Identifying weaknesses and suggesting improvements. East West Journal of Economics and Business, 2008(1).

Lane, J. E., & Johnstone, D. B. (2012). Universities and colleges as economic drivers: Measuring higher education’s role in economic development: SUNY Press

LONG, S., DUANG-EK-ANONG, S., & VONGURAI, R. (2021). Determinants of Business Education on Student Satisfaction in Higher Education: A Case Study in Cambodia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), 1405-1416.

Mahmood, K., & Shafique, F. (2010). Changing research scenario in Pakistan and demand for research qualified LIS professionals. Library Review, 59(4), 291-303.

Marwat, A. K., Shah, I. M., & Azam, K. (2011). Business Education in Pakistan: Growth, Problems and Prospects.

Milburn, A. (2012). University challenge: How higher education can advance social mobility. London: Cabinet Office.

Ministry of Federal Education and Professional Training Government of Pakistan. (2015-16). Pakistan Education Statistics: National Education Management Information System, Academy of Educational Planning and Management, Ministry of Federal Education and Professional Training Government of Pakistan.

Rahatullah Khan, M. (2013). Mapping entrepreneurship ecosystem of Saudi Arabia. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 9(1), 28-54.

Samwel Mwasalwiba, E. (2010). Entrepreneurship education: a review of its objectives, teaching methods, and impact indicators. Education+ Training, 52(1), 20-47.

Singh, M. (2013). Designing research to improve students’ learning:‘industry/university’collaborations for educating teacher-researchers. The Australian Educational Researcher, 40(5), 549-566

Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university: ERIC.

Torrance, W. E. (2013). Entrepreneurial campuses: Action, impact, and lessons learned from the Kauffman campuses initiative.

Vaivode, I. (2015). Triple Helix Model of University–Industry–Government Cooperation in the Context of Uncertainties. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 1063-1067.

Waddock, S., & Lozano, J. M. (2013). Developing more holistic management education: Lessons learned from two programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(2), 265-284.

Zgaga, P., Klemencic, M., Komljenovic, J., Miklavi?, K., Repac, I., & Jakacic, V. (2013). Higher education in the Western Balkans: reforms, development, trends. Key findings from field research: Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-01

How to Cite

Abrar, M. ., Abbasi, M. N. ., & Saqib, S. (2021). Teachers Perception Regarding Case Study Method as a Pedagogy in Business Schools. Review of Education, Administration & LAW, 4(2), 393-407. https://doi.org/10.47067/real.v4i2.152